Now accepting submissions for the upcoming volume
Vol. 2 · Issue 1 · 2026 Jan 31, 2026 Articles

Why Does Malaria Remain Endemic in Nigeria Despite Proven Interventions? A Mathematical Modeling Approach to Identify the Missing Link to Elimination

ME
Maryam Edmond Corresponding Nasarawa State University Keffi edmondmaryam@gmail.com Nigeria
ME
Melford Esuabom Nigerian polo army Nigeria
AI
Akyala Ishaku Nasarawa state university Nigeria
ZD
Zainab Dambazau Nigerian centre for disease control Nigeria
CA
Cyril Ademu National Malaria Elimination Program Nigeria
MR
Mbalya Rabo Jude Department of Medicine Benin Teaching Hospital Nigeria
IE
Ibrahim Edmond Musa Nasarawa state university Nigeria
Pages19-34 PublishedJan 31, 2026 LicenseOpen Access
Article
Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026)
VOL 2 · NO 1 · 2026 View issue

Abstract

Background Nigeria accounts for the largest share of the global malaria burden, with 27% of cases and 32% of deaths worldwide [1]. Despite large-scale deployment of insecticide-treated nets, indoor residual spraying, seasonal malaria chemoprevention, and intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy, transmission persists at high levels. This study used a Nigeria-specific mathematical model to investigate the “missing links” to malaria elimination. Methods We developed an age-structured SEIR-SEI model parameterized with Nigeria-specific epidemiological and intervention coverage data [2,3]. Intervention efficacy was adjusted for insecticide and drug resistance. Four scenarios were simulated over a two-year horizon: (i) baseline (status quo coverage), (ii) scale-up (world health organization target coverage levels), (iii) resistance-mitigated (higher efficacy of insecticide-treated nets, indoor residual spraying, and anti-malaria medication), and (iv) asymptomatic reservoir targeted (mass drug administration/active detection). Outcomes were age-specific infectious prevalence, vector prevalence, and incidence. Global sensitivity analysis using Latin Hypercube Sampling and Partial Rank Correlation Coefficients was conducted to assess parameter influence. Results Under baseline conditions, mean infectious prevalence was 7.7% in children and 4.5% in adults, with 21.3% of mosquitoes infectious, sustaining 405 new infections/day in the modeled population. Scale-up reduced prevalence in children (36%) and adults (25%), but incidence remained unchanged. Resistance mitigation achieved similar prevalence reductions but only marginal incidence impact (1%). Asymptomatic clearance achieved the largest short-term prevalence reduction (60% in children, 54% in adults), but incidence rebounded as transmission re-established. Sensitivity analysis identified insecticide-treated nets and indoor residual spraying efficacy, treatment coverage, and vector biting rate as the most influential parameters. Conclusions Malaria persists in Nigeria not simply due to inadequate tools, but because of three missing links : (i) suboptimal effective coverage, (ii) insecticide and drug resistance, and (iii) asymptomatic reservoirs. Addressing these simultaneously, through improved use of preventive tools, rapid deployment of next-generation nets and and indoor residual spraying, strengthened anti-malaria drug stewardship, and strategies to detect and clear asymptomatic infections is essential for Nigeria to achieve elimination targets. Nigeria’s success or failure will define global malaria progress.  

Keywords

References

  1. References
  2. World Health Organization. World Malaria Report 2023. Geneva: WHO; 2023.
  3. National Malaria Elimination Programme (NMEP), National Population Commission (NPopC), National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), ICF. Nigeria Malaria Indicator Survey 2021. Abuja, Nigeria, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: NMEP, NPopC, NBS, and ICF; 2022.
  4. National Population Commission (NPC) [Nigeria] and ICF. Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2018. Abuja, Nigeria, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: NPC and ICF; 2019.
  5. Griffin JT, Ferguson NM, Ghani AC. Estimates of the changing age-burden of Plasmodium falciparum malaria disease in sub-Saharan Africa. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3136. doi:10.1038/ncomms4136
  6. Griffin JT, Hollingsworth TD, Okell LC, Churcher TS, White M, Hinsley W, et al. Reducing Plasmodium falciparum malaria transmission in Africa: a model-based evaluation of intervention strategies. PLoS Med. 2010;7(8):e1000324. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000324
  7. Sherrard-Smith E, Hogan AB, Hamlet A, Watson OJ, Whittaker C, Winskill P, et al. Optimising the deployment of vector control tools against malaria: a modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22(10):1378–90. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00241-3
  8. World Health Organization. Guidelines for malaria vector control. Geneva: WHO; 2019.
  9. Ochomo EO, Bayoh NM, Walker ED, Abongo BO, Ombok MO, Ouma C, et al. The efficacy of long-lasting nets with declining physical integrity may be compromised in areas with high levels of pyrethroid resistance. Malar J. 2013;12:368. doi:10.1186/1475-2875-12-368
  10. Hemingway J, Ranson H, Magill A, Kolaczinski J, Fornadel C, Gimnig J, et al. Averting a malaria disaster: will insecticide resistance derail malaria control? Lancet. 2016;387(10029):1785–8. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00417-1
  11. Bhatt S, Weiss DJ, Cameron E, Bisanzio D, Mappin B, Dalrymple U, et al. The effect of malaria control on Plasmodium falciparum in Africa between 2000 and 2015. Nature. 2015;526:207–11. doi:10.1038/nature15535
  12. White LJ, Maude RJ, Pontavornpinyo W, Saralamba S, Aguas R, Stepniewska K, et al. The role of simple mathematical models in malaria elimination strategy design. Malar J. 2009;8:212. doi:10.1186/1475-2875-8-212
  13. Chitnis N, Hyman JM, Cushing JM. Determining important parameters in the spread of malaria through the sensitivity analysis of a mathematical model. Bull Math Biol. 2008;70(5):1272–96. doi:10.1007/s11538-008-9299-0
  14. Smith DL, Battle KE, Hay SI, Barker CM, Scott TW, McKenzie FE. Ross, Macdonald, and a theory for the dynamics and control of mosquito-transmitted pathogens. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(4):e1002588. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002588
  15. Winskill P, Slater HC, Griffin JT, Ghani AC, Walker PG. The US President’s Malaria Initiative, insecticide resistance and insecticide-treated net effectiveness in Africa: a modelling study. Malar J. 2019;18:18. doi:10.1186/s12936-019-2666-4
  16. Nwakanma D, Kessler DK, Dunn J, Conway DJ, Walther M. Asymptomatic malaria infections: identifying and controlling a silent reservoir. Front Immunol. 2021;12:633282. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.633282
  17. Bousema T, Okell L, Felger I, Drakeley C. Asymptomatic malaria infections: detectability, transmissibility and public health relevance. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;12(12):833–40. doi:10.1038/nrmicro3364
  18. World Health Organization. Global Technical Strategy for Malaria 2016–2030. Geneva: WHO; 2015.

License

CCBY-NC 4.0
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

This work is openly licensed — share and adapt freely with attribution to the authors and the journal. View license terms ↗

§ 06 — Related

Similar articles in this journal

Related peer-reviewed studies published in this journal.
View all issues

Efficacy of Real Acupuncture Compared with Sham Acupuncture for Prophylaxis of Migraine without Aura

Said Umair Shah, Haris Akbar, Syed Muhammad Momin, Laiba Malik, Syed Hatim Hussain, Irsa Nisar, Adam Nawab, Syed Muhammad Ahmad, Irum Hussain, Hira Rahim, Umairul Haq

Background and Objective:

Migraine without aura is a common neurological condition for which acupuncture is frequently used as a prophylaxis; however, its…

#Migraine without aura #acupuncture #sham acupuncture # randomized controlled trials
p. 29-53
10.64950/ijchmd.70